Commons:特色图片评选

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

跳转至评选区

此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语，如果需要中文交流区，请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区。

特色图片评选

欢迎来到特色图片评选！社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一，即特色图片，每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云：“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像，请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识，图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录，你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述，请参阅我们的年度评选。

你可以：

增加一个新提名
查阅图像评估指南
了解现在的评选
重申特色图片
查看目前的除名
阅览特色图片评选标准
参阅目录

规范

投票周期为10天，之后的投票将无效。
欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
提名者可以随时撤回提名。
每个注册用户都可以投票，匿名用户的票将不统计。
如果提名5天后没有支持票，该提名将提前结束。
通过的标准：至少5个支持票，支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
完成的投票保存在存档。
参见投票结束后操作指引。

提名

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像，并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可，那么请按照如下步骤操作：

1. 按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg）在下方的文本框输入图像名称，然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名，请按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2）展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）进行。

2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。）

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区的顶端加入新内容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作：请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作：如果您不是图像的创建者，请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括号）。

注意，你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当！

光暗度

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候，投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示，它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个（甚至四个）圈子，那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子，你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数，故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话，也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图，图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合，你则须要调校你的伽玛设置（在电脑的输出设置上，而不在于屏幕显示），直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难，然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意，在液晶显示（无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕）上观看图片，你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要，请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Gelber Knollenblätterpilz Bruderwald-20241025-RM-170802.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 09:40:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Amanitaceae
Info Yellow Destroyer (Amanita citrina) in the Bruderwald. Stack of 7 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Krigore (talk) 09:50, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:37, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mount Gambier (AU), Blue Lake -- 2019 -- 0707.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 05:57:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by XRay – nominated by SHB2000 //shb (t • c) 05:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 05:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bougainvillea New Leaves Ooty Jul26 A7CR 11898-967 zsp.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 03:21:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Nyctaginaceae
Info First leaves on Bougainvillea propagated from a cutting. The big leaf is 2 cm (0.79 in) long, the thorn is 1 cm (0.39 in) long. Ooty, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India. Focus stack of 70 images. No FPs of genus bougainvillea. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southwest Boeing 737-700 N947WN BWI MD1.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 02:07:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#United States
Info A Southwest Airlines 737 climbing after takeoff from Baltimore Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, Maryland, in front of a cumulus congestus cloud. Created, uploaded and nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very beautiful photo that not only captures the airplane well but also features a good composition. -- XRay 💬 08:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:56, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarasp (Taraspsee) gemeente Scuol, 18-09-2023. (actm.) 15.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 20:48:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Landscapes
Info Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. Alps above the lake. Created by Agnes Monkelbaan – uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:45, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Praia do Tonel 2024-12-20 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 17:52:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Portugal#Faro
Info: golden hour view of the Tonel Beach; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa hybrida ‘Graham Thomas’ in Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende, Quebec, Canada 984.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 03 Aug 2026 14:28:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Order : Rosales
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Very nice, reminiscent of some Georgia O'Keefe paintings. You should repeat the specific information contained in the file name in the description though, and better categorization is needed. Acroterion (talk) 16:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done thanks Wilfredor (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: lovely colours --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different, bravo! This is what FPC is about. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent use of light, creating an elegant and almost abstract floral portrait. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:13, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Wow, what a unique and niche image. A truly fascinating floral portrait. --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 22:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ovva olfa --Tagooty (talk) 03:26, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding! Ethereal. — ERcheck (talk). 05:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support No question about it—it's wonderful. The neckline is well chosen, and the colors go well together. -- XRay 💬 08:46, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Krigore (talk) 09:48, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-throated Kingfisher 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 08:58:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus_:_Halcyon
Info created by Manojkiri photography – uploaded by Manojkiri photography – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Rich colours, rare scene, but too small image with tiny bird. The bird itself with the lizard fits into the image 672 x 492 px (0,315 Mp only). This is too poor in comparison with the current FP bird nominations. Also this image has been overprocessed. Finally, regretfull Oppose -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:10, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As above. Also, the lighter background on the left is distracting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:021a European bee-eater eating an Emperor dragonfly in Pfyn-Finges Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 08:48:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:00, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 12:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! Photos like this require very good gear, a lot of patience in the fiel and lab, very many versions to choose from and ... some talent! Am I right, Giles? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Caught a rare moment --Tagooty (talk) 03:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Similar to one image of the year --Wilfredor (talk) 10:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:002 Male Lion prowling in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 08:43:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Panthera_leo_(Lions)
Info Male Lion (Panthera leo) prowling in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Prowling primarly consists of walking slowly low-to-the-ground with head down while fixing the target and trying to be as stealthy as possible. This action is a behavior commonly expressed by large carnivores to assess their surroundings, stalk preys, or approach with reduced detectability. In this instance, the lion was pursuing a cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) mother and her three cubs, that where close to a recent kill. Lions frequently engage in kleptoparasitism by usurping kills from smaller predators and may also attack cheetahs or their offspring to reduce interspecific competition for prey resources.
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:43, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:43, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:00, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent composition, sharpness, and timing. The prowling pose and direct gaze make for a very engaging wildlife image. Question Approximately how far were you from the lion when this photo was taken? I'm curious about the shooting distance. --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! If I remember well at that moment I was probably somewhere between 15-30 meters away but the lion kept getting closer as the cheetah mother and cubs successively passed behind our car to try to hide -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 05:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:46, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Krigore (talk) 09:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 10:17, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferry Building San Francisco from Hyatt Regency with R-Evolution and Bay Bridge 2026 dllu.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 05:37:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 05:37, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info Similar as existing FP File:San Francisco Ferry Building (cropped).jpg and File:Ferry Building at night.jpg but newer and much higher resolution. Note that the building has been repainted in a darker shade of grey compared to the earlier pics. dllu (talk) 05:37, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (talk) 05:37, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Mid-afternoon lighting is too harsh. The existing FP, though lower resolution, is overall better IMO. --Tagooty (talk) 03:33, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloemknoppen van een Stewartia rostrata 21-06-2026. (actm.).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 04:34:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Theaceae
Info Two developing flower buds of a Stewartia rostrata. Focus stack of 21 photos. (Diameter large flower bud ~16mm. Diameter small flower bud ~12mm.)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:34, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent detail, a good addition to the Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dipsacus seedling.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 22:43:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Caprifoliaceae
Info Dipsacus fullonum fruit. Сreated by Andy Morffew – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 22:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Юрий Д.К. 22:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very sharp photo, nice texture -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:27, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glacier de Mont-de-Lans - France - 2020.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 22:39:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Isère
Info Glacier de Mont-de-Lans, French Alps. Created by Radek Kucharski – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 22:39, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Юрий Д.К. 22:39, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:13, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:26, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 05:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow-spotted Agama in Kuwait.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 21:02:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Agamidae_(Dragon_Lizards)
Info created by Manojkiri photography – uploaded by Manojkiri photography – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:02, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:02, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support.RH🦋 (talk) 09:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It is a shame the tail is cut at the bottom, but nonetheless Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez ángel de cola dorada (Pomacanthus chrysurus), Ambalihabe, Madagascar, 2025-09-16, DD 125.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 19:52:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacanthidae_(Marine_angelfish)
Info Goldtail angelfish (Pomacanthus chrysurus), Ambalihabe, Madagascar. It's found at depths of between 1–30 metres (3.3–98.4 ft) on shallow reefs western Indian Ocean which have rich growths of coral, or rocky reefs. This species attains a maximum total length of 33 centimetres (13 in) and its diet is dominated by sponges, tunicates, crustaceans, and zooplankton. Note: there are yet no FPs of this species of angelfish on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, and well composed with just the right amount of lead room. Can you identify what the smaller, blurry fish is in the bottom right? Could be good to add to the description if you can. Cmao20 (talk) 20:59, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:29, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:50, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac d'Arpitetta, Besso et Glacier de Moming.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 19:05:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
Info Very high resolution and good quality photograph. Nice icy, mountainous mood. A good illustration of how to take a really great photo in dull light, in my opinion. created by Espandero – uploaded by Espandero – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:31, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Where tranquil waters, majestic peaks, and a grazing flock unite in perfect harmony. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 11:38, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Padar Island, Komodo National Park, Indonesia, 20250822 0929 2659.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 19:05:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Indonesia
Info IMO interesting landscape and good composition - no FPs from here (very few FPs from Indonesia despite it being the fourth most populous country in the world - the Nature category is almost empty). created by Jakubhal – uploaded by Jakubhal – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:31, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 04:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed a very good composition, featuring a very interesting coastline. – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:La vallata di Poggiorsini.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 18:30:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Italy
Info Created and uploaded by Fishmax77 – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I was excited when looking at the thumbnail because it looked like something new. In the end, image quality is very poor and the image is tilted. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:57, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to sadly agree with Alvesgaspar. //shb (t • c) 11:39, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Tilted and noised, also declined before as QI candidate and not improved -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:32, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice pic. I've denoised the photo, fixed PC and removed spots. Looks much better now. Opinions? Юрий Д.К. 16:07, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks good as a thumb but lacks quality.--Ermell (talk) 09:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dipsacus fullonum 2026 G1.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 15:24:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Caprifoliaceae
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:24, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:24, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 19:24, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent, almost an abstract picture. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Alvesgaspar. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, excellent composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hongzhi1.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 14:09:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 14:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Min968 (talk) 14:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ming Wuzong.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 14:12:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Min968 (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altai horses 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 10:43:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov – nominated by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mongolian horse herd. -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Random framing, overall unsharpness. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Alvesgaspar. I find the image quality fine but although it's hard to get the right crop here, I don't feel that this picture quite manages it. Cmao20 (talk) 19:21, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:EMU884 at Tai'an (Sep 21, 2020).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2026 at 03:46:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Taiwan
Info created and uploaded by Ganbaruby – nominated by SHB2000 --shb (t • c) 03:46, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --shb (t • c) 03:46, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:29, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good compo, i was sure to see lot of CA on electric fences above, but none are there. Good. --Mile (talk) 09:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good enough quality for QI. But no magic, sorry. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:25, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support In my opinion sufficiently striking for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:20, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Well done, no question about it. However, it's missing that certain something. -- XRay 💬 08:48, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Negombo, St. Mary's Church, 2025-07 CN-02.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2026 at 21:23:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Sri Lanka
Info created and uploaded by Carschten – nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:23, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:23, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think crop above is a bit tight, i would add some px of sky. Also, when doing PD, did you enlarge vertical ? Seem it need some too. Otherwise good shot, QI. @Carschten, ★. --Mile (talk) 09:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The immediate feeling is that the building is leaning to the left, which is not confirmed by checking the verticals. That has probably to do with the non-horizontal ground? Any way, I would not go as far with the PC and would leave the verticals slightly convergent. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @ArionStar, PetarM, and Alvesgaspar: Thank you very much for the nomination and your feedback. I’ve extended the crop at the top and also distorted the perspective again. In my view, we have to accept that the building itself und the surrounding have very few truly straight horizontal and vertical lines. I’ve tried a lot, but a completely satisfactory result won’t be possible due to my perspective and the building’s construction. If there is one, I’d be happy to see your suggestions. However, I’m not really sure what "enlarge vertical" means or how I’m supposed to correct the perspective while still keeping the verticals slightly convergent. --kaʁstn 11:59, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Not your fault or the building's fault, I believe. The vertical and horizontal lines are correct to within about 0.2 degrees. I asked ChatGPT and he suggested it might be the result of an assymetrical background and lighting. I rotated the image 0.5 degrees clockwise ... and magic, it looked straight. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, quality, and light. Cmao20 (talk) 19:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:51, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:2025-01-12 IBU World Cup Biathlon Oberhof 2025 STP 5949.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2026 at 12:07:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Other team sports
Info IBU Biathlon World Cup Oberhof 2025: Elvira Öberg (SWE, Sweden) during the prone shooting stage. Created by Stepro – uploaded by Stepro – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 12:17, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Small size and the space should be to the right and not back --Wilfredor (talk) 13:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Framing is not the best, image looks a little too blue. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:57, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I don't love the left side of the image, but the rest is good. //shb (t • c) 03:47, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm not fully convinced by the framing. The image also appears slightly cool, with a subtle blue cast in the snow and other neutral areas. Overall, a very good image, but not quite enough for my support. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:56, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. Otherwise QI. Too bad, if could be zoomed to her and make it much better. --Mile (talk) 08:38, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, there is nothing wrong with this picture - good lighting, sharp, good illustration of the subject - but I struggle to see it as having the wow-factor for FP, it doesn't get across any of the emotions I associate with great sports photography. It is a little small, a little dark, and feels somehow static, certainly compared to other photos in the category. Cmao20 (talk) 19:16, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:04, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crique Millefeuille.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2026 at 08:32:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by Smailtn -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 08:32, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 08:32, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No info provided either in the image file or nomination. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Alvesgaspar, infformation added SAIDI Ismail (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful image, really gets across why it has the name 'Millefeuille'! Good composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cmao20, thank you, Yes, absolutely. Stratified rocky cliffs, formed from sedimentary layers that have been eroded by the sea to resemble a mille-feuille pastry. SAIDI Ismail (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: interesting geology. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:33, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:05, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 11:39, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would remove the large white spot just right of the cloud (noted). Overall very nice landscape. Юрий Д.К. 16:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Юрий Д.К, thank you, the large white stain removed SAIDI Ismail (talk) 23:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:49, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Krigore (talk) 09:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:5 panel mosaic of the northern summer Milky Way.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2026 at 20:43:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxies
Info A 5 panel panorama of the northern summer Milky Way, extending from Cygnus to Scorpius, taken with a mirrorless camera, 50 mm lens, and a basic tracking mount. And a lot of fiddling to get it to stitch together. Created, uploaded, and nominated by brainandforce — brainandforce [yap] 20:43, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author — brainandforce [yap] 20:43, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work! Yann (talk) 08:12, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb effort and excellent results. Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is amazing. //shb (t • c) 03:47, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Krigore (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cinereous vulture - Al- Al-Liyah reserve 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2026 at 19:30:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Aegypius
Info created by Ghasem bavi – uploaded by Ghasem bavi – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —brainandforce [yap] 20:51, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support.RH🦋 (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:03, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:04, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:05, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:20, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Krigore (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre de Belém por Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2026 at 19:22:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Portugal
Info created and uploaded by Rodrigo.Argenton – nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:22, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 19:22, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull lighting, unnatural perspective. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Why unnatural? ★ 06:10, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
concordo plenamente com o Joaquim, necessária uma correção de perspetiva, algo relativamente fácil de fazer. Além disso, acho que o monumento está demasiado em cima; tenderia a acrescentar um pouco mais de espaço Wilfredor (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2026 (UTC)I inadvertently violated the IBAN rule; I didn't notice the author. I apologize. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Vc sabe que vc não podia estar aqui, né? Então tá bom, só pra constar. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 14:12, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Because this is not what we really see when looking at the monument, due to perspective correction. Better take the shot a little farther, or leave the verticals as they were captured by the camera. Please take a look at this picture, whihc is not even a QI. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:10, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You want a straight shot in every picture... The perspective increases the power of the edification.

It's kind of sad and concerning, this posture. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 14:11, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Question Enlighten me, please. Why can't Wilfredor make a comment, what is the IBAN rule? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Please see en:WP:IBAN. They are not to interact with the user in question. Further questions can be taken at the user's talk page. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:11, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. Good quality but given that this is a very commonly photographed subject I don't think the light or composition are impressive enough to distinguish it for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see any problem in the image. ★ 15:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. //shb (t • c) 03:48, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:الكناب من جيل الى جيل.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2026 at 17:57:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White
Info created by A2071 – uploaded by A2071 – nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 17:57, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info I find this photo so fascinating that I nominated it. Unfortunately, it has a few issues with its categorization and description, but the subject matter was so compelling. -- XRay 💬 18:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:57, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is indeed a fascinating image, but I believe a Commons featured picture should be minimally documented, which is not the case. The only thing we have is the image name, which Google translates "The books are passed down from generation to generation." But a lot of aditional information is available, just by dumping the image into Google Gemini: the photographer, the sculpture, place, etc. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I gave it a try. However, I'm now concerned that the photographer, Mohammad Hossein Madadi, uploaded the photo himself. -- XRay 💬 19:00, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Concerns have grown even further, as the sculpture is reportedly located in Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates. -- XRay 💬 19:06, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I will support if we have the right to host this picture on the site, but I don't know if that's true yet given the above questions. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right, I see at least two issues here. First, is this image subject to copyright? Even if the uploader is the author, that does not imply the image is free. Second, may photographs of the sculpture in Saudi Arabia be published? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @A2071: Unfortunately, I can't answer the questions that have come up. I would ask the photographer to comment on this. -- XRay 💬 08:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can only agree – the photo is fascinating, but at the same time there may be legal problems, at least regarding the sculpture. According to Commons:Freedom of panorama, the United Arab Emirates don’t have freedom of panorama (and Saudi Arabia doesn’t have it, too). Of course it is possible that the photographer got a permission to take and even to publish the photo including the sculpture. But only the photographer can explain this … – Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez ballesta titán (Balistoides viridescens), Nosy Sakatia, Madagascar, 2025-09-18, DD 61.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2026 at 07:08:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Balistidae_(Triggerfish)
Info Titan triggerfish (Balistoides viridescens) waiting in a cleaning station, see the bluestreak cleaner wrasses (Labroides dimidiatus) cleaning the gills in Nosy Sakatia, Madagascar. The titan triggerfish lives in lagoons and at reefs to depths of 50 centimetres (20 in) in most of the Indo-Pacific. With a length of up to 75 centimetres (30 in) it's the largest species of triggerfish in its range. The titan triggerfish is diurnal and solitary. It feeds on sea urchins, molluscs, crustaceans, tube worms and coral. It's one of a number of species of fish which can hunt and eat the crown-of-thorns starfish. They have been observed being aggressive to other fish who enter their territory and females can be aggressive to divers and snorkelers around their nests during the reproduction season, which occurs for about a week in each month (either after the full moon or new moon, depending on the population). Note: there are no FPs on Commons of the genus Balistoides. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:08, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question It looks a little purple, is this the natural color? --Wilfredor (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. I made a slight correction just before the nom because it looked to greenish. Poco a poco (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I took the liberty of trying a manual white balance; I left it in the history in case you think it looks better. Wilfredor (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Wilfredor, I guess that my new version is closer to yours now Poco a poco (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Poco for your feedback, I voted support now Wilfredor (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, but crop is a bit too tight. Do you have more space at left? Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:28, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, I need to check the RAW file this night CET Poco a poco (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version with a bit more of crop on the left (and accordingly top and down) and a more yellowish WB Poco a poco (talk) 06:08, 24 July 2026 (UTC) FYI @Wilfredor, Yann, and Cmao20: [reply]

Support Agree the crop is tight but still FP - very high quality and high resolution photograph taken under difficult conditions. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Was too O for tight crop and WB. But you manage it. I think colors are more to pristine to original than 1st one. --Mile (talk) 09:25, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:56, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2012 -- 8083.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2026 at 06:03:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose This image isn't that extraordinary, sorry. Wolverine X-eye 19:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Plenty extraordinary enough for me. A beautiful study in light and shade. Excellent quality and elegantly composed. Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support compo significantly outweighs the lack of wow IMO. //shb (t • c) 03:48, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 08:21, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:20, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brown Parrotbill in Darjeeling May 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2026 at 04:56:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paradoxornithidae_(Parrotbills)
Info If image size was not a priority I would choose this frame. All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:56, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:56, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 22:33, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well done. To me, the shape and posture of the bird feel reminiscent of Egyptian art. — Julian Lupyan (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:49, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 03:49, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of the many bird candidates appearing every month, this one looks special to me. Not because of its quality, which is not extraordinary, but because of the bird itself. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:32, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 23:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reconciliation by Vasconcellos, Coventry.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2026 at 21:10:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created by Martinvl – uploaded by Martinvl – nominated by Martinvl -- Martinvl (talk) 21:10, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info A search on Google using the search string <<"martinvl" "vasconcellos">> showed that this image has been used by 28 distinct organisations outside Wikimedia - mainly Christian churches and groups, but also travel guides, a newspaper article and an architectural magazine. The users wrote in English, German, Spanish, Japanese and Norwegian. Martinvl (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martinvl (talk) 21:10, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support On the small side, but I think it should be FP for interest of the motif, value of the motif, quality of composition and light, and clear value to reusers. Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Living room in apartment of Condomínio do Edifício Zaher, Le Blond, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.jpg

Voting period ends on Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:07:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Brazil
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting shot. Is time on EXIF correct ? Is that moon or sun ? If moon i prefer first shot. I think even ISO 3200 wont hurt, but f/4-5 would be much better. --Mile (talk) 09:37, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It was the moon and a dark room. I forgot to adjust the camera's time when traveling; it was set to Canadian time. I've corrected it on the image description page. Wilfredor (talk) 09:59, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If so, than 1st shot with colder temperature would be beter. --Mile (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done It's almost the raw colors Wilfredor (talk) 02:39, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 08:14, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:33, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:00, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Support if the people were absent. This is a very nice, well-composed interior photograph with good lighting and detail. However, the presence of a person sleeping on the sofa is distracting and makes the image less suitable as a general illustration of the room.--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 10:17, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment, i understand the concern, but their presence is part of the composition—it is not an accidental. Beyond providing a sense of human scale, it transforms the room, turning it from a generic interior into an inhabited space with a narrative. Without it, the photograph would look more like an Airbnb or real estate listing. The image depicts the end of a beach day in Rio de Janeiro, the phone left on the floor, the glasses on the table, the hastily placed bag, and the person asleep on the sofa all contribute to the narrative Wilfredor (talk) 12:36, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree. The person is a net positive. Yann (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Wilfredor Thank you for your explanation. I completely understand your artistic intention, and I do like the photograph.

Maybe it's just my housewife instincts speaking 😄. Whenever I see an interior, I automatically imagine how it would look if everything were neat and tidy! So, for me, the sleeping person catches my eye more than the beautiful room itself.

That said, I appreciate the story you wanted to tell, and I respect your artistic choice. We simply see the image from different perspectives, and that's what makes photography discussions interesting. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
An image can tell a different story to each person, which is why I rarely explain or comment on my photos. I think it is lovely to see things from a homemaker’s perspective, and it is also nice to know that there is a real person behind the words. As someone who lived alone for a long time, keeping everything neat and organized was relatively easy. Now that I have a family with teenager and baby, it can be a little more challenging, but I still enjoy having things tidy and in order Wilfredor (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 23:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support On reflection, for me, the presence of the person, the phone on the ground, and the glasses on the table adds a welcome sense of realism to this picture and elevates it from a rather straightforward shot of a room, to a painterly and interesting composition. Cmao20 (talk) 00:16, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:元马君祥等朝元图（永乐宫三清殿壁画）.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2026 at 15:27:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Other_religions_–_wide
Info created by 马君祥 – uploaded by Wcam – nominated by 向史公哲曰 -- 向史公哲曰 (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
SupportIf we promote 八十七神仙卷.png to Featured Picture status despite potential source URL accessibility issues, then this painting should also be listed as a Featured Picture. -- 向史公哲曰 (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Once again, the information provided for a potential featured picture is obviously insufficient. Basic thinks such as the dimensions, medium, authorship, date, place and purpose of the image are not provided. It is not even clear if the image depicts the whole thing or not. I understand that there maybe language difficulties, but there are plemty of tools today to solve the problem quickly and effectively. I do not say this is the case, but dumping images here at FPC whith no info or justification is becoming a common practise. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:17, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've improved the description but we have the problem with the url source Wilfredor (talk) 16:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP now because of the work that Wilfredor did to document things properly. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Yann (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:15, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:02, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ice structure no. 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2026 at 14:16:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice
Info Created and uploaded by BogTar201213 – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info The previous nom remained incomplete due to the lack of necessary descriptions. Now that the required information has been added by the author, I am re-nominating this image. -- IamMM (talk) 14:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:16, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for doing the necessary but boring work to make the nomination valuable. I am happy to support this time. Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:51, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting structures and transitions. The minimalist aesthetic works very well. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm really sorry, but this photo doesn't have the "wow" factor for me --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 12:21, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Although this image could be evaluated mainly for its aesthetics, I would need some aditional information to understand what we are really looking at. Two main questions: first, is this only ice and snow, or is there some water too (whose presence may be inferred by the presence of the darker areas)? Second, we have no way of scaling this image. Was the picture taken 200m or 2m from the subject? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:58, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I see this image more as an artwork rather than an educational one, and its unclear scaling somewhat contributes to its artistic dimension but I understand that this isn't interesting for everyone. Looking at the other two photos taken by the photographer from this same location (no. 1 and no. 3), I can say that the dark spots are water, and the image was taken from a close distance at the point where the ice meets the lake (referring to macro and close-up in categories). Take a look at ice in File:CzarnyStawpodRysami Rysy 2016.jpg. IamMM (talk) 18:11, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 10:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 23:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:50, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plage de l'Anse du Vieux Fort (19).jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2026 at 12:35:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Guadeloupe
Info We have already this image from this place as FP. Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual and compelling composition. I love the colours, the subtle use of the rule of thirds, and the ripples of the colours in the water. Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree that a close-up of the ripples/reflections in the water could be FP-worthy, but this compo overall is too ordinary in my eyes, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Poco — Julian Lupyan (talk) 01:36, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As above. Nice quality image though. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:53, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 23:04, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian rhinoceros in Kaziranga National Park March 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 06.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2026 at 07:54:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Rhinocerotidae_(Rhinoceros)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Nice shot but we already have 9 FPs of rhinoceroses and I don't think it can match them for composition. Cmao20 (talk) 12:27, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Irregardless of the number of FPs we have of rhinos, this image is definitely worthy of a star. Wolverine X-eye 19:56, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Is there a limit on the number of photos of certain species? In any case, this is an excellent photo that fits perfectly into this category.--Ermell (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No, and there shouldn’t be a limit, but in my personal judgement an FP should be one of the best in its specific scope, and I don’t think this is as good as some of the others for composition or light. The angle is not appealing to me and the picture seems a little dark. I get the feeling I’m going to be outvoted here, so if I end up being the only voter blocking a five day promotion, I will remove my vote as a courtesy to Tisha’s great photos which I want to make clear I do enjoy. Cmao20 (talk) 23:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, I have re adjusted the exposure, hope it looks better now. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:44, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It does look a lot better. Cmao20 (talk) 11:14, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:06, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:39, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think portrait mode isn't suitable here, pano is better. --Mile (talk) 09:43, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 12:18, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:31, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canadian Museum for Human Rights and downtown Winnipeg skyline at night, Manitoba, Canada.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2026 at 02:41:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
Info created by Sahagun Ethan – uploaded by Sahagun Ethan – nominated by Sahagun Ethan -- Sahagun Ethan (talk) Sahagun Ethan (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sahagun Ethan (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice night shot, good quality and composition. I don't mind the ghosts. Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the notes and for bringing back photos of that beautiful country (take the opportunity before winter arrives) --Wilfredor (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also don't mind the ghosts. They add atmosphere to this excellent night shot. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:57, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'm sorry, but I do. Any chance to remove them? Poco a poco (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:39, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Randomianin. //shb (t • c) 03:50, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 23:04, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cala Pulcino 2023-11-15.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2026 at 13:21:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: Pulcino Cove, Lampedusa; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remember If this is actually a panorama, add {{Panorama}} or {{Stitch}} to the description so the check exempts it. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am enjoying your photographs of bays and coves. I find this one especially well composed because of the gentle curve of dappled shadows, and the light is also lovely. Cmao20 (talk) 00:04, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! There is definitely no shortage of these in Sicily... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:59, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:48, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The upper right part ist quite unsharp. And overall I miss the WOW effect. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:09, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've to agree, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:38, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:25, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support //shb (t • c) 03:50, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not only the rightmost part is unsharp but the background at large. It would need a larger dof. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Still beautiful calm landscape despite some technical issues. Юрий Д.К. 22:58, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cap Hmem grottes.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2026 at 12:33:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by Smailtn -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:33, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:33, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support Remember If this is actually a panorama, add {{Panorama}} or {{Stitch}} to the description so the check exempts it. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wilfredor, thank you Panorama added SAIDI Ismail (talk) 17:54, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Missing wow and sharpness. Light is dull. Below the FP-bar. --Milseburg (talk) 15:11, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. It's QI for sure but I'm not really understanding the composition here. I'd like to see more of the rock formations at the bottom - the composition looks a little incomplete/arbitrarily cut-off without them. Cmao20 (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I can't move back any further to get a full shot of the rocks. This is the ideal photo for capturing these caves from below. SAIDI Ismail (talk) 07:35, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I concur, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 19:04, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Imho nice landscape Юрий Д.К. 22:54, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Milseburg has a good point about light/sharpness and I understand Cmao20’s point with the rocks, but if I view the image in full size without any distracting stuff around it, it still impresses me and gives a very good impression of the caves. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yogyakarta Indonesia Prambanan-temple-complex-02.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2026 at 23:42:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Indonesia
Info created and uploaded by Cccefalon – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:42, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality image of an architectural wonder. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:42, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. Maybe the light could be nicer but apart from that it's hard to think how this could have been done better. Cmao20 (talk) 01:12, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:58, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:03, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. · · · 🌸 Rachmat04 · 🍵 10:45, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Detail is not the best but the compo is very good Poco a poco (talk) 11:45, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:45, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh my; that's something. Wolverine X-eye 16:18, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (for now) The picture is nice when opened in full size. But the subject seems underexposed otherwise. I tried to improve it, and believe it is possible to make the buildings brighter. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Cccefalon: for what they make of this suggestion. Personally, adding very slight brilliance in the buildings may be an improvement, but to me it is also completely OK as is. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:29, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light is not good here. In any case i would low exposure of sky and increase subject-structures, withoud grass which is yalling already. --Mile (talk) 08:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco. //shb (t • c) 03:51, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:20260317 Medinilla magnifica 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2026 at 19:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Melastomataceae
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:00, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:58, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry no wow due to the artificial flash light -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:04, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I make Basile's words mine Poco a poco (talk) 11:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:23, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:47, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Echinops bannaticus (la boule azurée).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2026 at 19:44:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Carduoideae
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and a beautiful study of nature. Shallow depth of field doesn't matter to me here. Cmao20 (talk) 01:08, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:58, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:47, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scarlet dragonfly in Jahraa reserve farms 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2026 at 15:56:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
Info created by Ghasem bavi – uploaded by Ghasem bavi – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 15:56, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 15:56, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:58, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, this has many good points but I find the blurry foliage in the foreground distracting and although the detail on the eye is good, there is some posterisation. Not quite FP in a competitive category for me. Cmao20 (talk) 01:07, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20.--Ermell (talk) 08:05, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:House - Playa Santiago 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2026 at 12:48:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:48, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:48, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like this picture but I am having trouble seeing it as sufficiently outstanding in composition or subject for FP. I would like to hear more from you about why you nominated this picture, in the hope that it helps me see it in a different way. Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is an old, abandoned - let's say "dead" - building surrounded green, healthy, "living" trees and shrubs and it shows therfore the contrast between past and present life. Let us wait a few more years, and life will return to where dead walls stand today. --Llez (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm convinced. Support. Cmao20 (talk) 15:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose From the description, this appears to be a normal house rather than a special building or a monument. While the photo is technically good, it doesn't have the "wow" factor I expect from a Featured Picture. In my opinion, it is not FP, sorry. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:45, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 09:45, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 10:20, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree, sorry, alone in my village there are a bunch of houses similar to this one. Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cylindropuntia imbricata July 2026-2.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2026 at 15:11:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Cactaceae
Info Flower of the so-called walking stick cane cactus (Cylindropuntia imbricata), which grows in the southwest United States and Mexico and is considered as an invasive species in other parts of the world. The name comes from the traditional use of its wooden structure. This picture intends to show the contrast between the gorgeous flower and the long and nasty spines, some of them barbed. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:01, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:05, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:08, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the image overall, but I wish the flower had a better framing --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:41, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed the contrast between the beautiful flower and the spines makes the image. – Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 14% of the full sensor pixels, também o sujeito principal (flor) está sendo atacado por uma espinha --Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandelbrot Set Image 112.png

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2026 at 10:32:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info Deep zoom near the extreme western tip of the Mandelbrot set at X ≈ -2.0 (specifically -1.999995...). View size: 1.15 × 10⁻¹¹⁹. The structure exhibits a striking symmetry resembling a dividing cell, or a stylized infinity symbol (∞). Rendered using perturbation theory with 8×8 SSAA (Super-Sampling Anti-Aliasing). C++ source code is included below. CPU AMD Phenom II X6 1055, 6 x Сore. Time spent: 21 hours. Created, uploaded and nominated by Aokoroko -- Aokoroko (talk) 10:32, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 10:32, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wikipedian12512 (talk) 13:17, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry, this vote has been struck because the voter does not yet meet the FPC voting requirements (minimum 100 Commons edits). Please feel free to participate again once the eligibility requirements are met. Thank you for your understanding. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:24, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikipedian12512: Please read Commons:Featured picture candidates#Voting -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:29, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For what it's worth, the top/bottom crop feels too tight. That is, I feel like there should be slightly more "blue" visible. Also, it's impressive that you can render detail at that level of 'zoom', but i'm curious if this particular structure at ('cell division') was already known or if you 'discovered' it while searching for an interesting structure. tyvm Pdanese (talk) 19:43, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm doing more "blue" now! 21 hours!

Well, I was looking for interesting structure, yes. Aokoroko (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This color combination is too vibrant and the image itself isn't that good either. Wolverine X-eye 09:00, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done Aokoroko (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice, mathematically generated image -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:48, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is one of the images I like more. I wonder where within the Mandelbrot set we have a structure that connects both shapes. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: I am glad I have an AMD TR 7970X, doing this with a Phenom must be a lot of pain :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is very time-consuming to find such regions.--Majow (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:41, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Aokoroko: It would be great to include in the image file a scheme showing the exact location, in Mandelbrot set, where the picture was calculated. I assume that no part of this image depicts parts of the Mandelbrot set itself, which is usuaaly painted black. Which would mean that this was taken from somme peripheric part and the differemt colours correspond to different numbers of iterations before the cycle diverged. Am I right? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:47, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Scheme showing the exact location, in Mandelbrot set - and how??? Is there one somewhere? At X ≈ -2.0 (specifically -1.999995...)!!! Aokoroko (talk) 13:05, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Info See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mandelbrot-with-xy-grid.png -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are partly right! Yes, the vibrant colored areas represent the escape time (the number of iterations before the sequence diverges to infinity).

However, parts of the Mandelbrot set itself are actually present in this image. Inside those small 'infinity' structures, there are tiny, dark island copies of the main Mandelbrot set (micro-cardioids).

As mentioned in the description, this is a deep zoom at X ≈ -2.0 (specifically -1.999995...). This location is at the very tip of the main antenna (the extreme western needle) of the Mandelbrot set. Since the zoom is incredibly deep (1.15 × 10⁻¹¹⁹), making a visual map/scheme is practically impossible, as any standard resolution overview map would look like a single atom or completely disappear at this scale. The exact numerical coordinates provided are the only way to locate it. Aokoroko (talk) 13:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Re = -1.99999543561201124623198345433951143502785679245726844745821388800402678

499411681518036306219179273434395557574279985918047221291197081186140687781560831995

and

Im = -0.00000000000000000000000026198152173811047783694060060607013913873144250

985383083459221663448338433592617272786772587281530484110756597337683912309313885172

Width = 0.76e-119 Aokoroko (talk) 13:31, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And if you zoom in - not by 10e-119 but by 4.6e-162 (and 162 digits of Re and Im) - you can see a large Mandelbrot set! Aokoroko (talk) 15:37, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Re = -1.999995435612011246231983454339511435027856792457268

4474582138880040267849941168151803630621917927343439555757

427998591804722129119708118614068778156083199446008941139

and

Im = -0.000000000000000000000000261981521738110477836940600

6060701391387314425098538308345922166344833843359261727278

677258728153048411075659733768391230931388517168205369880

4.6e-162 A large Mandelbrot set! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mandelbrot_large.png Aokoroko (talk) 16:42, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
At this magnification, however, iteration counts higher than 50,000 are required. Majow (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! Aokoroko (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was already demonstrated that there are no disjointed parts of the Mandelbrot set. That is, all of them are interconnected. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes! Aokoroko (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

According to en:Mandelbrot set#Basic properties: Douady and Hubbard showed that the Mandelbrot set is connected. They constructed an explicit conformal isomorphism between the complement of the Mandelbrot set and the complement of the closed unit disk. Mandelbrot had originally conjectured that the Mandelbrot set is disconnected. This conjecture was based on computer pictures generated by programs that are unable to detect the thin filaments connecting different parts of $M$ . Upon further experiments, he revised his conjecture, deciding that $M$ should be connected. A topological proof of the connectedness was discovered in 2001 by Jeremy Kahn.^[1] Majow (talk) 23:10, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:45, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment So where are they: Pdanese and Alvesgaspar? Aokoroko (talk) 19:11, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Indeed, I have a question. I assume that no point in this image belongs to the M-set, that is, iterations diverged to infinity in all of them. Which means calculations were made in the close periphery. Am I right? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:20, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No! The point in the middle (horizontal and vertical – both in the center) – in e-162 gives the Mandelbrot set!!! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mandelbrot_large.png Aokoroko (talk) 23:07, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
If the point in the middle belongs to the Mandelbrot set, then there must be other M-set parts connected to it because the whole M set is connected. Were they caught by your algorithm? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:21, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am familiar with the algorithm: the algorithm is based on a dot grid and smooths the calculated colors by averaging; consequently, it cannot capture these fine filaments. However, this is not a flaw, but an artistic decision. --Majow (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right mathematically: the Mandelbrot set is connected, and these parts must be linked. However, there is a huge difference between mathematical truth and pixel resolution. At this extreme zoom (Width = 4.6 × 10⁻¹⁶²). When we look at the wider view (10⁻¹¹⁹), the grid of pixels is way too coarse. The connecting threads are billions of times smaller than a single pixel at that scale, so they completely "drop through the cracks" of the grid. They exist, but they are physically invisible to the rendering algorithm at that magnification level. It's like trying to see a 1-millimeter wire on a map of the entire solar system. Aokoroko (talk) 12:22, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Researcher holding a lab mouse - Crimean Federal University - ANDY7392.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2026 at 09:11:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Scientists
Info created by Andrey Chernogorodov – uploaded by Andrey Chernogorodov – nominated by LetmeEditit -- LetmeEditit (talk) 09:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LetmeEditit (talk) 09:11, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not a nice subject but certainly a well composed picture with plenty of value to Wikimedia projects. Cmao20 (talk) 14:26, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition trouble: unfortunate cropping at the bottom and especially on the left, half of the main character's head is missing -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:17, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per George. The tight crop, especially cutting off much of the researcher's head, weakens the composition. This would be a good candidate for COM:VIC instead. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beside illustrating animal cruelty, I don't see much value. Quality is OK, but composition is not really interesting. Yann (talk) 19:21, 18 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop, bad composition, normal quality and in all honesty not special enough to be featured. Wolverine X-eye 08:50, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. It might be valuable for the people in the image who are part of the context, but for viewers, I don't see much value in a poor creature hanging by its tail and the smile of the young lady present at this scene. I'm not very familiar with VIC, but I don't think this is an example of the best image within scope. -- IamMM (talk) 09:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm surprised people don't like the composition, that was the reason why I nominated the image: I like the curve of the girls' faces and their gazes looking up at the mouse, which to me is the focal point of the image. I understand being upset at the animal cruelty on display, but I think it is a good illustration of the subject (animal testing), and I think that how upsetting a subject is should not decide whether it is FP or not. I think this image, in its controversial theme, can spark an interesting debate. LetmeEditit (talk) 11:26, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I agree that this is actually a well-composed image, ethical issues aside. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I find the curve of the arm and faces to be very interesting compositionally, and I believe the bright colors and expressions conflicting with the condemnable subject matter give this picture notable complexity. In my opinion this photograph has plenty of utility even judging solely by virtue of the reaction it warranted here. I interpret it as an illustration of how, when given justification, people allow themselves to be happy with the reprehensible. Depiction of the controversial should not be discouraged, as it allows us to see the real state of the world, instead of just what we agree with. — Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, the photo is well composed, but it does not mitigate the implicit animal cruelty. In a way, depicting that reality with a nice picture seems to blank what it represents. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think there is an important distinction between illustrating cruelty and supporting cruelty. This is a well composed image that illustrates a common practice which is perceived by many to be cruel. Would featuring it mean that we support the cruelty? I don't think so. An aside: we have several images of animals as food. One, iirc, of several dead pig carcasses in a market. Those images were featured. I don't see how this is more cruel than that, and I say this as a meat eater. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:36, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. I don't like what's going on in the photograph but I don't think that should preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Crop-compo, colors. --Mile (talk) 08:21, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

↑ Kahn, Jeremy (8 August 2001). The Mandelbrot Set is Connected: a Topological Proof.

[1] Kahn, Jeremy (8 August 2001). The Mandelbrot Set is Connected: a Topological Proof.

[1]